WaterLyli

I'm not really sure about this account. It says "Joined: Jul 18, 2016 04:33PM" and two days later, this person (or computer) is following 519 people. They have no bio, no stories, no reading list and (as far as I've seen) have not done any other activity on WattPad than follow people. There have been no replies to comments in this section, no "you're welcome for following".
          
          As @alexi- said "Jul 18, 2016 05:03PM" (which is exactly thirty minutes after the creation of this account) " lmao following 520 people in 30 minutes, what an accomplishment! thanks for the follow anyhow :))"
          
          Does anybody think they'd be able to achieve that feat in thirty minutes  without being a computer using a randomized following algorithim? Not to mention that if it were a person, they'd still have to find the actual people on WattPad?
          
          You can't just invent usernames (especially ones that have actual first and last names in them) and expect to find an account with that name. For example; @johannahefer (sorry, but you were the first example I found) was followed by this account and honestly, do you really think a person is going to imagine that many different names (without repetition on top of that- if you look, the usernames are diverse) in that little time?
          
          I'm trying to find a pattern... though I know it has nothing to do with followers. @WilliamShakespeare has 26753 followers while some just have two. I'd like to say that it maybe has to do with the registration date just so we can have an idea of why we were followed but I'm most certainly not checking all these 519 followed people.
          
          Hey, somebody was unfollowed (the initial number was 520). I wonder who. If you were unfollowed by a computer, there must be a reason. The fact may simply be that this person just wants to start off with a few followers as some people follow back. Of course if this account actually replies to my comment accordingly, than I'll stop thinking that this is a computer but for now, I'm kind of suspicious.

johannahefer

@WaterLyli lol yeah it is strange, isn't it?
Reply